Aggressive Driving Behaviors and Immediate Auditory Feedback: A Study in the Wild
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47756/aihc.y11i1.199Palabras clave:
Driving Behavior, inmediate auditory feedback, GPS-smarthphone system, Aggressive driving, real-time intervention, road safety, in-the-wild experiment, operant conditioning, GPSResumen
Aggressive driving patterns represent a critical factor in traffic accidents worldwide. This work studies the effectiveness of immediate auditory feedback on aggressive behaviors. We conducted an in-the-wild study with 8 drivers, from which we monitored harsh acceleration, aggressive braking, and speeding events during a complete driving day using mobile devices. Results show 37% reductions in total aggressive events per km and 70% in harsh braking events for the experimental group, with large effect sizes (Cohen's d = -1.424 for braking). Although statistical significance was limited by sample size (N=8), findings suggest the effective potential of auditory feedback, especially for conscious behaviors like harsh braking.
Descargas
Citas
Arvin, R., Khattak, A.J., Kamrani, M., and Rio-Torres, J. 2019. Safety evaluation of connected and automated vehicles in mixed traffic with aggressive and considerate drivers. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems 23, 6, 572-584.
Brown, I. D., Tickner, A. H., and Simmonds, D. C. V. (1969). Interference between concurrent tasks of driving and telephoning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53(5), 419-424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028103
Castignani, G., Derrmann, T., Frank, R., and Engel, T. 2015. Driver behavior profiling using smartphones: A low-cost platform for driver monitoring. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine 7, 1, 91-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MITS.2014.2328673
Chen, R., Jing, L., Yin, C., and Yu, B. 2020. Advanced driver assistance system using machine learning approach for aggressive driving behavior detection. Transportation Research Record 2674, 4, 1-12.
Chen, Z., Yu, J., Zhu, Y., Chen, Y., and Li, M. 2015. D&RSense: Vehicle driving and routing sensing via smartphones. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks. ACM, 187-198.
Duran, A. and Earleywine, M. 2012. GPS Data Filtration Method for Drive Cycle Analysis Applications. SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-0743. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4271/2012-01-0743
Ebert, J. P., McDonald, C. C., Xiong, R. A., Abdel-Rahman, D., Khan, N., Nelson, M., Lee, A., Patel, A., Friday, S., Aryal, S., Harhay, M. O., & Delgado, M. K. (2025). A Randomized Field Trial of Smartphone-Based Feedback Designed to Encourage Safe Driving: Comparing Focused and Self-Chosen Goals to Standard Usage-Based Insurance Messaging (Technical Report). AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety.
Engström, J., Markkula, G., Xue, L., and Merat, N. (2017). Simulating the effect of cognitive load on braking responses in lead vehicle braking scenarios. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI '17). ACM, 32-39.
Fogg, B. J. (2003). Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/764008.763957
Fogg, B. J. (2009). A behavior model for persuasive design. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology (Persuasive '09). ACM, Article 40, 1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1541948.1541999
Gao, S., Frejinger, E., and Ben-Akiva, M. 2010. Adaptive route choices in risky traffic networks: A prospect theory approach. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 18, 5, 727-740. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2009.08.001
Johnson, D.A. and Trivedi, M.M. 2011. Driving style recognition using a smartphone as a sensor platform. In 14th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC). IEEE, 1609-1615 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2011.6083078
Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. K. (2015). Likert scale: Explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396-403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York.
Mantouka, E., Barmpounakis, E., Vlahogianni, E., and Golias, J. 2021. Smartphone sensing for understanding driving behavior: Current practice and challenges. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology 10, 3, 266-282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2020.07.001
Mantouka, E.G., Barmpounakis, E.N., and Vlahogianni, E.I. 2019. Identification of driving safety profiles from smartphone data using machine learning techniques. Safety Science 119, 91-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.01.025
McKenna, F. P. (2016). The role of automaticity in driving. In Hennessy, D. A. and Wiesenthal, D. L. (Eds.), Traffic Psychology: An International Perspective (pp. 33-52). Nova Science Publishers.
Michie, S., Richardson, M., Johnston, M., Abraham, C., Francis, J., Hardeman, W., Eccles, M. P., Cane, J., and Wood, C. E. (2013). The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: Building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 46(1), 81-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6
Mohd Zaki, N.I., Che Husin, S.M., Abu Husain, M.K., Abu Husain, N., Ma'aram, A., Amilah Marmin, S.N., Adanan, A.F., Ahmad, Y., and Abu Kassim, K.A. 2021. Auditory Alert for In-Vehicle Safety Technologies: A Review. Journal of the Society of Automotive Engineers Malaysia 5, 2, 178-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56381/jsaem.v5i1.155
Oinas-Kukkonen, H. and Harjumaa, M. (2009). Persuasive systems design: Key issues, process model, and system features. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 24(1), Article 28, 485-500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.02428
Peppes, N., Alexakis, T., Adamopoulou, E., and Demestichas, K. 2021. Driving Behaviour Analysis Using Machine and Deep Learning Methods for Continuous Streams of Vehicular Data. Sensors 21, 14, 4704. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s21144704
Phillips, R. O., Ulleberg, P., & Vaa, T. (2011). Meta-analysis of the effect of road safety campaigns on accidents. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43(3), 1204-1218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.01.002
Salim, K.A. and Idrees, I.M. 2013. Design and Implementation of Web-Based GPS-GPRS Vehicle Tracking System. International Journal of Computer Science Engineering and Technology 3, 7, 92-98.
Tarqui, G., Castro, L.A., and Favela, J. 2011. Reducing drivers' distractions in phone-based navigation assistants using landmarks. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 1-8.
Thompson, K., Martinez, R., and Lee, S. 2019. Smartphone-based ADAS: Effectiveness and user acceptance in real-world conditions. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems 23, 4, 315-328.
Wahlström, J., Skog, I., and Händel, P. 2017. Smartphone-based vehicle telematics: A ten-year anniversary. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 18, 10, 2802-2825. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2017.2680468
White, J., Thompson, C., Turner, H., Dougherty, B., and Schmidt, D.C. 2011. WreckWatch: Automatic traffic accident detection and notification with smartphones. Mobile Networks and Applications 16, 3, 285-303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-011-0304-8
World Health Organization. (2023). Global status report on road safety 2018. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Zhao, Y., Yamamoto, T., and Morikawa, T. 2018. An analysis on older driver's driving behavior by GPS tracking data: Road selection, left/right turn, and driving speed. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition) 5, 6, 428-438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2017.05.013
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Wilber Flores Preciado, Luis A. Castro, Cynthia Beatriz Pérez Castro, Jesus Rigoberto Villavicencio Navarro

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
AMexIHC hace todo el esfuerzo para asegurar la precisi´n y rigurosidad de la informaci´ón (el "Contenido") contenida en nuestras publicaciones. Sin embargo, AMexIHC y nuestros representantes no representan o garantizan de ninguna manera la precisi´ón, completitud o pertinencia de el Contenido para ning´ún propósito. Cualquier opinión y punto de vista expresados en esta publicación son las opiniones y puntos de vista de los autores, y no son de ninguna manera los puntos de vista o con anuencia de AMexIHC. La precisi´ón de el Contenido no debería ser confiada en su totalidad y debería ser corroborada con las fuentes primarias de informaci´ón.