Editorial and Evaluation Policies

Double-blind peer-review

The academic quality of the manuscripts published in this journal is supported by a rigorous double-blind peer-review process. Each submitted manuscript undergoes an initial editorial assessment to verify its thematic relevance and compliance with the journal’s editorial standards. Subsequently, manuscripts are evaluated by subject-matter experts who conduct an objective, independent, and critical review of the work’s originality, significance, methodological rigor, and scientific contribution. The comments and recommendations provided by reviewers play a fundamental role in strengthening the quality of the manuscripts and ensuring that published contributions meet the highest academic and ethical standards.