GigSense

An LLM-Infused Tool for Workers’ Collective Intelligence

Authors

  • Kashif Imteyaz Northeastern University
  • Claudia Flores Saviaga Northeastern University
  • Saiph Savage Northeastern University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47756/aihc.y9i1.159

Keywords:

Human- centered computing, Human computer interaction (HCI), Interactive systems and tools, LLM, Empirical studies in collaborative and social computing

Abstract

Collective intelligence among gig workers yields considerable ad- vantages, including improved information exchange, deeper social bonds, and stronger advocacy for better labor conditions. Especially as it enables workers to collaboratively pinpoint shared challenges and devise optimal strategies for addressing these issues. However, enabling collective intelligence remains challenging, as existing tools often overestimate gig workers’ available time and uniformity in analytical reasoning. To overcome this, we introduce GigSense, a tool that leverages large language models alongside theories of collective intelligence and sensemaking. GigSense enables gig workers to rapidly understand and address shared challenges effectively, irrespective of their diverse backgrounds. GigSense not only empowers gig workers but also opens new possibilities for supporting workers more broadly, demonstrating the potential of large language model interfaces to enhance collective intelligence efforts in the evolving workplace.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Lyn Y Abramson, Martin E Seligman, and John D Teasdale. 1978. Learned helplessness in humans: critique and reformulation. Journal of abnormal psychology 87, 1 (1978), 49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-843X.87.1.49

Amal Alabdulkarim, Siyan Li, and Xiangyu Peng. 2021. Automatic Story Generation: Challenges and Attempts. NAACL HLT 2021 (2021), 72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.nuse-1.8

B Appleyard. 2004. The Paradox of Choice: why more is less by Barry Schwartz. NEW STATESMAN-LONDON- 810 (2004), 49–50.

Aaron Bangor, Philip T Kortum, and James T Miller. 2008. An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Intl. Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 24, 6 (2008), 574–594. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802205776

Stephen R Barley. 1986. Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative science quarterly (1986), 78–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2392767

Benjamin B Bederson and James D Hollan. 1994. Pad++ a zooming graphical interface for exploring alternate interface physics. In Proceedings of the 7th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. 17–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/192426.192435

Yochai Benkler. 2017. Peer production, the commons, and the future of the firm. Strategic Organization 15, 2 (2017), 264–274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127016652606

Janine Berg. 2015. Income security in the on-demand economy: Findings and policy lessons from a survey of crowdworkers. Comp. Lab. L. & Pol’y J. 37 (2015), 543.

Janine Berg, Uma Rani, and others. 2021. Working conditions, geography and gender in global crowdwork. Work and Labour Relations in Global Platform Capitalism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar (2021), 93–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802205138.00013

Ioulia Bessa, Simon Joyce, Denis Neumann, Mark Stuart, Vera Trappmann, and Charles Umney. 2022. A global analysis of worker protest in digital labour platforms. Vol. 70. International Labour Organization. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54394/CTNG4947

John Brooke. 1996. Sus: a “quick and dirty’usability. Usability evaluation in industry 189, 3 (1996), 189–194.

Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, and others. 2020. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems 33 (2020), 1877–1901. 18 GigSense:

Alice Cai, Steven R Rick, Jennifer L Heyman, Yanxia Zhang, Alexandre Filipowicz, Matthew Hong, Matt Klenk, and Thomas Malone. 2023. DesignAID: Using Generative AI and Semantic Diversity for Design Inspiration. In Proceedings of The ACM Collective Intelligence Conference. 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3582269.3615596

Dan Calacci. 2022. Organizing in the End of Employment: Information Sharing, Data Stewardship, and Digital Workerism. In 2022 Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work (CHIWORK 2022). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 14, 9 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3533406.3533424 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3533406.3533424

Julie Yujie Chen, Alessandro Delfanti, and Michelle Phan. 2023. Worker Resistance in Digital Capitalism| Worker Resistance in Digital Capital- ism—Introduction. International Journal of Communication 17 (2023), 8.

John Joon Young Chung, Wooseok Kim, Kang Min Yoo, Hwaran Lee, Eytan Adar, and Minsuk Chang. 2022. TaleBrush: Sketching stories with generative pretrained language models. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501819

Philip R Cohen, Jerry Morgan, and Martha E Pollack. 2003. Collective Intentions and Actions. (2003).

Giles Colborne. 2017. Simple and usable web, mobile, and interaction design. New Riders.

Rob Cross and Lee Sproull. 2004. More than an answer: Information relationships for actionable knowledge. Organization science 15, 4 (2004), 446–462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0075

Sayantan Dasgupta, Trevor Cohn, and Timothy Baldwin. 2023. Cost-effective distillation of large language models. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023. 7346–7354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.463

Valerio De Stefano. 2016. The rise of the" just-in time workforce": on demand work, crowdwork, and labor protection in the" gig economy". Comparative labor law and policy journal 37, 3 (2016), 461–471.

Alfred T DeMaria. 2016. The Future of Internet Organizing. Management Report for Nonunion Organizations 39, 2 (2016), 3–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mare.30135

Brenda Dervin. 1983. An overview of sense-making research: Concepts, methods, and results to date. (1983).

Jwala Dhamala, Tony Sun, Varun Kumar, Satyapriya Krishna, Yada Pruksachatkun, Kai-Wei Chang, and Rahul Gupta. 2021. Bold: Dataset and metrics for measuring biases in open-ended language generation. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency. 862–872. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445924

V.B. Dubal. 2017. The Drive to Precarity: A Political History of Work, Regulation, & Labor Advocacy in San Francisco’s Taxi & Uber Economies. Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law 38, 1 (2017), 73–135. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26356922

Jimmy Efird. 2011. Blocked randomization with randomly selected block sizes. International journal of environmental research and public health 8, 1 (2011), 15–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8010015

Rebecca S Etz, Martha M Gonzalez, Aimee R Eden, and Jodi Winship. 2018. Rapid sense making: A feasible, efficient approach for analyzing large data sets of open-ended comments. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 17, 1 (2018), 1609406918765509. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918765509

Emilio Ferrara. 2023. Should chatgpt be biased? challenges and risks of bias in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.03738 (2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4627814

Chelsea Finn, Paul Christiano, Pieter Abbeel, and Sergey Levine. 2016. A connection between generative adversarial networks, inverse reinforcement learning, and energy-based models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.03852 (2016).

Claudia Flores-Saviaga, Shangbin Feng, and Saiph Savage. 2022. Datavoidant: An AI System for Addressing Political Data Voids on Social Media. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6, CSCW2 (2022), 1–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3555616

Katy Ilonka Gero, Vivian Liu, and Lydia Chilton. 2022. Sparks: Inspiration for science writing using language models. In Designing interactive systems conference. 1002–1019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3532106.3533533

Karan Girotra, Lennart Meincke, Christian Terwiesch, and Karl T Ulrich. 2023. Ideas are Dimes a Dozen: Large Language Models for Idea Generation in Innovation. Available at SSRN 4526071 (2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4526071

Karan Girotra, Christian Terwiesch, and Karl T Ulrich. 2010. Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Management science 56, 4 (2010), 591–605. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1144

Mary L Gray and Siddharth Suri. 2019. Ghost work: How to stop Silicon Valley from building a new global underclass. Eamon Dolan Books.

Rafael Grohmann, Mateus Mendonça, and Jamie Woodcock. 2023. Worker Resistance in Digital Capitalism| Communication and Work From Below: The Role of Communication in Organizing Delivery Platform Workers. International Journal of Communication 17 (2023), 19.

Stefan Harrer. 2023. Attention is not all you need: the complicated case of ethically using large language models in healthcare and medicine. EBioMedicine 90 (2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104512

Jordan Hoffmann, Sebastian Borgeaud, Arthur Mensch, Elena Buchatskaya, Trevor Cai, Eliza Rutherford, Diego de Las Casas, Lisa Anne Hendricks, Johannes Welbl, Aidan Clark, and others. 2022. Training compute-optimal large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.15556 (2022).

Tom Hope, Ronen Tamari, Daniel Hershcovich, Hyeonsu B Kang, Joel Chan, Aniket Kittur, and Dafna Shahaf. 2022. Scaling Creative Inspiration with Fine-Grained Functional Aspects of Ideas. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517434

Jane Hsieh, Miranda Karger, Lucas Zagal, and Haiyi Zhu. 2023. Co-Designing Alternatives for the Future of Gig Worker Well-Being: Navigating Multi-Stakeholder Incentives and Preferences. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 664–687. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3563657.3595982

Ziheng Huang and Stephen MacNeil. 2023. DesignNet: a knowledge graph representation of the conceptual design space. In Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Creativity and Cognition. 375–377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3591196.3596614

Ziheng Huang, Kexin Quan, Joel Chan, and Stephen MacNeil. 2023. CausalMapper: Challenging designers to think in systems with Causal Maps and Large Language Model. In Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Creativity and Cognition. 325–329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3591196.3596818

James Garrett Jesse. 2011. The elements of user experience: User-centered design for the web and beyond. (2011).

Ziwei Ji, Nayeon Lee, Rita Frieske, Tiezheng Yu, Dan Su, Yan Xu, Etsuko Ishii, Ye Jin Bang, Andrea Madotto, and Pascale Fung. 2023. Survey of hallucination in natural language generation. Comput. Surveys 55, 12 (2023), 1–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3571730

Peiling Jiang, Jude Rayan, Steven P Dow, and Haijun Xia. 2023. Graphologue: Exploring Large Language Model Responses with Interactive Diagrams. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.11473 (2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3586183.3606737

Hannah Johnston. 2020. Labour geographies of the platform economy: Understanding collective organizing strategies in the context of digitally mediated work. International Labour Review 159, 1 (2020), 25–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ilr.12154

Hannah Johnston and Chris Land-Kazlauskas. 2018. Organizing on-demand: Representation, voice, and collective bargaining in the gig economy. (2018).

Vera Khovanskaya, Lynn Dombrowski, Jeffrey Rzeszotarski, and Phoebe Sengers. 2019. The Tools of Management: Adapting Historical Union Tactics to Platform-Mediated Labor. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 208 (nov 2019), 22 pages. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3359310 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3359310

Steve Krug. 2000. Don’t make me think!: a common sense approach to Web usability. Pearson Education India.

Chinmay Kulkarni, Steven P Dow, and Scott R Klemmer. 2013. Early and repeated exposure to examples improves creative work. In Design thinking research: Building innovation eco-systems. Springer, 49–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01303-9_4

Chinmay Kulkarni, Tongshuang Wu, Kenneth Holstein, Q Vera Liao, Min Kyung Lee, Mina Lee, and Hariharan Subramonyam. 2023. LLMs and the Infrastructure of CSCW. In Companion Publication of the 2023 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 408–410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3584931.3608438

Bongshin Lee, Nathalie Henry Riche, Petra Isenberg, and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2015. More than telling a story: Transforming data into visually shared stories. IEEE computer graphics and applications 35, 5 (2015), 84–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2015.99

Vili Lehdonvirta. 2018. Flexibility in the gig economy: managing time on three online piecework platforms. New Technology, Work and Employment 33, 1 (2018), 13–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12102

Vili Lehdonvirta. 2022. Cloud empires: How digital platforms are overtaking the state and how we can regain control. MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/14219.001.0001

James R Lewis. 2018. The system usability scale: past, present, and future. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 34, 7 (2018), 577–590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1455307

Feng Li, Jingxian Chen, and Xuejun Zhang. 2023. A Survey of Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translation. Electronics 12, 13 (2023), 2980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12132980

Hanlin Li, Nicholas Vincent, Stevie Chancellor, and Brent Hecht. 2023. The Dimensions of Data Labor: A Road Map for Researchers, Activists, and Policymakers to Empower Data Producers. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 1151–1161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3593013.3594070

Tianyi Li, Kurt Luther, and Chris North. 2018. Crowdia: Solving mysteries with crowdsourced sensemaking. Proceedings of the ACM on Human- Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (2018), 1–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3274374

Percy Liang, Rishi Bommasani, Tony Lee, Dimitris Tsipras, Dilara Soylu, Michihiro Yasunaga, Yian Zhang, Deepak Narayanan, Yuhuai Wu, Ananya Kumar, and others. 2022. Holistic evaluation of language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.09110 (2022).

Michael Xieyang Liu, Tongshuang Wu, Tianying Chen, Franklin Mingzhe Li, Aniket Kittur, and Brad A Myers. 2023. Selenite: Scaffolding Decision Making with Comprehensive Overviews Elicited from Large Language Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.02161 (2023).

Stephen MacNeil, Zijian Ding, Kexin Quan, Ziheng Huang, Kenneth Chen, and Steven P Dow. 2021. ProbMap: Automatically constructing design galleries through feature extraction and semantic clustering. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 34th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 134–136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3474349.3480203

John Maeda. 2006. The laws of simplicity. MIT press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8274-3060-1

I Mandl, M Curtarelli, S Riso, O Vargas Llave, and E Gerogiannis. 2015. New forms of employment. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. 160 p. (2015).

Lars Gunnar Mattsson, Daniela Corsaro, and Carla Ramos. 2015. Sense-making in business markets–the interplay between cognition, action and outcomes. Industrial Marketing Management 48 (2015), 4–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.03.003

Paul Mihas. 2019. Qualitative data analysis. In Oxford research encyclopedia of education. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.1195

Piotr Mirowski, Kory W Mathewson, Jaylen Pittman, and Richard Evans. 2023. Co-Writing Screenplays and Theatre Scripts with Language Models: Evaluation by Industry Professionals. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581225

Evgeny Morozov. 2013. To save everything, click here: The folly of technological solutionism. PublicAffairs.

Geoff Mulgan. 2018a. Big mind: How collective intelligence can change our world. Princeton University Press.

Geoff Mulgan. 2018b. Big mind: How collective intelligence can change our world. Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400888511

MZ Naser. 2023. Do We Need Exotic Models? Engineering Metrics to Enable Green Machine Learning from Tackling Accuracy-Energy Trade-offs. Journal of Cleaner Production 382 (2023), 135334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135334

OpenAI. 2024. OpenAI Platform — platform.openai.com. https://platform.openai.com/docs/api-reference. (2024). [Accessed 13-01-2024].

Carol Packham. 2008. Active citizenship and community learning. Learning Matters.

Srishti Palani, Aakanksha Naik, Doug Downey, Amy X Zhang, Jonathan Bragg, and Joseph Chee Chang. 2023. Relatedly: Scaffolding Literature Reviews with Existing Related Work Sections. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580841

Maria-Carmen Pantea. 2013. The changing nature of volunteering and the cross-border mobility: where does learning come from? Studies in Continuing Education 35, 1 (2013), 49–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2012.677427

Sharoda A Paul and Meredith Ringel Morris. 2009. CoSense: enhancing sensemaking for collaborative web search. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1771–1780.

Jamie Peck and Nik Theodore. 2012. Politicizing contingent work: Countering neoliberal labor market regulation... from the bottom up? South Atlantic Quarterly 111, 4 (2012), 741–761. 20 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-1724165

S Camille Peres, Tri Pham, and Ronald Phillips. 2013. Validation of the system usability scale (SUS) SUS in the wild. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, Vol. 57. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 192–196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213571043

Pirolli Peter and Stuart Card. 2005. The sensemaking process and leverage points for analyst technology as identified through cognitive task analysis. Proceedings of international conference on intelligence analysis (2005).

Christopher Peterson and Martin EP Seligman. 1983. Learned helplessness and victimization. Journal of Social Issues 39, 2 (1983), 103–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1983.tb00143.x

Aleksandra Piktus, Christopher Akiki, Paulo Villegas, Hugo Laurençon, Gérard Dupont, Alexandra Sasha Luccioni, Yacine Jernite, and Anna Rogers. 2023. The roots search tool: Data transparency for llms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.14035 (2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.acl-demo.29

Frances Fox Piven and Richard Cloward. 2012. Poor people’s movements: Why they succeed, how they fail. Vintage.

Rida Qadri. 2023. Worker Resistance in Digital Capitalism| Algorithmized Not Atomized: The Distributed Solidarity of Jakarta’s Gig Workers. International Journal of Communication 17 (2023), 20.

Yolanda Jacobs Reimer, Matthew Hagedal, Peter Wolf, and Bradley Bahls. 2011. Turning the desktop inside-out: Evaluating information access and management through a single interface. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62, 12 (2011), 2327–2346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21627

Niloufar Salehi, Lilly C Irani, and Michael S Bernstein. 2015. We Are Dynamo: Overcoming Stalling and Friction in Collective Action for Crowd Workers. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1621–1630. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702508

Jörgen Sandberg and Haridimos Tsoukas. 2015. Making sense of the sensemaking perspective: Its constituents, limitations, and opportunities for further development. Journal of organizational behavior 36, S1 (2015), S6–S32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1937

Saiph Savage and Mohammad H Jarrahi. 2020. Solidarity and AI for Transitioning to Crowd Work during COVID-19. In The New Future of Work Symposium 2020.

Steve Sawyer, Kevin Crowston, and Rolf T Wigand. 2014. Digital assemblages: evidence and theorising from the computerisation of the US residential real estate industry. New Technology, Work and Employment 29, 1 (2014), 40–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12020

Cyrille Schwellnus, Assaf Geva, Mathilde Pak, and Rafael Veiel. 2019. Gig economy platforms: Boon or Bane? (2019). [88] Martin EP Seligman. 1972. Learned helplessness. Annual review of medicine 23, 1 (1972), 407–412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.me.23.020172.002203

Martin EP Seligman. 2011. Building resilience. Harvard business review 89, 4 (2011), 100–106.

Aaron Shaw, Haoqi Zhang, Andres Monroy-Hernandez, Sean Munson, Benjamin Mako Hill, Elizabeth Gerber, Peter Kinnaird, and Patrick Minder. 2014. Computer supported collective action. interactions 21, 2 (2014), 74–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2576875

Pao Siangliulue, Kenneth C Arnold, Krzysztof Z Gajos, and Steven P Dow. 2015. Toward collaborative ideation at scale: Leveraging ideas from others to generate more creative and diverse ideas. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. 937–945. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675239

Pao Siangliulue, Joel Chan, Steven P Dow, and Krzysztof Z Gajos. 2016. IdeaHound: improving large-scale collaborative ideation with crowd-powered real-time semantic modeling. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 609–624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2984511.2984578

John B Smith. 1994. Collective intelligence in computer-based collaboration. CRC Press.

Jack W Snook and Dan C Olsen. 2006. Recruiting, training, and maintaining volunteer fire fighters. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Sangho Suh, Meng Chen, Bryan Min, Toby Jia-Jun Li, and Haijun Xia. 2023a. Structured Generation and Exploration of Design Space with Large Language Models for Human-AI Co-Creation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.12953 (2023).

Sangho Suh, Bryan Min, Srishti Palani, and Haijun Xia. 2023b. Sensecape: Enabling Multilevel Exploration and Sensemaking with Large Language Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.11483 (2023).

Will Sutherland and Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi. 2017. The gig economy and information infrastructure: The case of the digital nomad community. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction 1, CSCW (2017), 1–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3134732

John Sweller. 1994. Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and instruction 4, 4 (1994), 295–312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5

Henri Tajfel and John C Turner. 2004. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Political psychology. Psychology Press, 276–293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203505984-16

Henri Tajfel, John C Turner, William G Austin, and Stephen Worchel. 1979. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Organizational identity: A reader 56, 65 (1979), 9780203505984–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199269464.003.0005

Himanshu Thakur, Atishay Jain, Praneetha Vaddamanu, Paul Pu Liang, and Louis-Philippe Morency. 2023. Language Models Get a Gender Makeover: Mitigating Gender Bias with Few-Shot Data Interventions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.04597 (2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.acl-short.30

Jenifer Tidwell. 2010. Designing interfaces: Patterns for effective interaction design. " O’Reilly Media, Inc.".

Upwork. 2024. Upwork Community Forum. https://community.upwork.com/. (2024). Accessed: 2024-02-28.

Martijn Van Zomeren, Tom Postmes, and Russell Spears. 2008. Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: a quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological bulletin 134, 4 (2008), 504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504

Gwendolyn Paige Watson, Lauren D Kistler, Baylor A Graham, and Robert R Sinclair. 2021. Looking at the gig picture: Defining gig work and explaining profile differences in gig workers’ job demands and resources. Group & Organization Management 46, 2 (2021), 327–361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601121996548

Juliet Webster. 2016. Microworkers of the gig economy: Separate and precarious. In New Labor Forum, Vol. 25. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 56–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1095796016661511

KE Weick. 1995. Sensemaking in organizations Sage Publications. Thousand Oaks, CA (1995).

Alex Wood and Vili Lehdonvirta. 2019. Platform labour and structured antagonism: Understanding the origins of protest in the gig economy. Available at SSRN 3357804 (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3357804

Alex J Wood, Mark Graham, Vili Lehdonvirta, and Isis Hjorth. 2019. Good gig, bad gig: autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, employment and society 33, 1 (2019), 56–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616

Zheng Yao, Silas Weden, Lea Emerlyn, Haiyi Zhu, and Robert E Kraut. 2021. Together but alone: Atomization and peer support among gig workers. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW2 (2021), 1–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3479535

Ann Yuan, Andy Coenen, Emily Reif, and Daphne Ippolito. 2022. Wordcraft: story writing with large language models. In 27th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 841–852. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3490099.3511105

JD Zamfirescu-Pereira, Richmond Y Wong, Bjoern Hartmann, and Qian Yang. 2023. Why Johnny can’t prompt: how non-AI experts try (and fail) to design LLM prompts. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–21. ‘ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581388

Haoqi Zhang, Andrés Monroy-Hernández, Aaron D Shaw, Sean A Munson, Elizabeth M Gerber, Benjamin Mako Hill, Peter Kinnaird, Shelly Diane Farnham, and Patrick Minder. 2014. WeDo: End-To-End Computer Supported Collective Action.. In ICWSM. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14567

Xiaolong Zhang, Yan Qu, C Lee Giles, and Piyou Song. 2008. CiteSense: supporting sensemaking of research literature. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 677–680. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357161

Downloads

Published

2024-11-30

How to Cite

[1]
Imteyaz, K. et al. 2024. GigSense: An LLM-Infused Tool for Workers’ Collective Intelligence. Avances en Interacción Humano-Computadora. 9, 1 (Nov. 2024), 135–145. DOI:https://doi.org/10.47756/aihc.y9i1.159.

Issue

Section

Research Papers

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.